What The Research Says
Pornography, for example, is usually only a typo and a click away in most households. The research (see here)
concludes that pornography elicits the same biochemical response as PCP
or any other
highly addictive hallucinogenic drug, requiring increasing doses of a
more concentrated and vile
nature to provide the same biochemical response with consecutive
addictive pornographic voyerism.
Another example of cyberspace dangers are the myriads of activists
(example: Clinton Fein's "ADULTeration") who feel compelled to expose
as many children as possible whether "four years old or seventeen" to
"mature dialog", and since it isn't technically pornography their
efforts are unrestricted, and in some cases even promoted by
educational foundations (examples: "Advocates for Youth", "Siecus",
etc.) that get government funding to encourage alternative lifestyles
among youth as young as 5 years old. In short, enjoying the
benefits of living in an information age while
protecting youth from unwanted influences is a significant challenge,
but one that is easily addressed with just a little upfront effort.
| "Very young kids don't need the internet. Within a few hours of training any 13 year old can be nearly as computer competent as another 13 year old regardless of their background. Beyond 13 years old however it’s critical that kids gain certain computer skills or they will be left behind. Unfortunately even many children who already grow up with computers never gain the computer skills that will most help them" |
Solutions
How best to meet this challenge? Do you shut your children out
of
the digital world entirely? Actually, this is not necessarily a bad
approach when kids are less than 13-14 years of age (although you can't
do this when they're not at home). Computers provide few advantages for
young children than can't be quickly made-up later on.
For example, within a few hours
any 13 year old can become nearly as computer competent as another
regardless of their background. Beyond 13 years old however it’s
critical that
kids gain certain computer skills or they will be
left behind.
How about giving them an unconnected computer to use any time they want? This has many advantages over internet capable computers, though it's only one of many viable strategies and can be part of a multi-faceted approach. A properly configured unconnected computer can have all of the scholastic advantages of a connected computer and then some. Student based research is perhaps even made easier by using an unconnected computer if it is loaded with Encarta, or Encyclopedia Britannica on DVD, etc. Teachers would far prefer those references to most web-based references (although you can get wikipedia on DVD). Having them use an unconnected PC whenever they want can help them focus on really learning about the computer, computing, programming, etc… instead of surfing the net and loitering in ineffectual chat rooms. The truth is that "the digital divide" is a political and marketing term unscrupulously used to promote government funding of broadband projects, whereas a cheap (used) properly configured unconnected computer can be far more advantageous for kids than an expensive window to the internet requiring a $25/mo to $50/mo fee.
Allowing a net-capable computer in your kid’s bedroom (or other private area) will almost guarantee access to whatever they want no matter how "good" you think they are. It isn't about them being "good", it's about them being curious, and kids are curious. Don’t kid yourself, kids are kids; I kid you not. A simple typo can peak a curiosity, which often becomes seemingly harmless voyerism, descending to a habit, and from there even worse - again, it's all in well documented research. Again, don't kid yourself... it isn't about being "good", it's about the curiosity of a child (which is a good thing) and human nature, which can be an entirely good nature if nutured by conscientious parents.
| "... kids are curious. Don't kid yourself, kids are kids; I kid you not. Would you tell your kid to never play with guns and then put a loaded one under their bed? Would you?" |
Here’s the multifaceted approach that we use at our house. Feel free to borrow as much of it for your own high-tech family strategy as you’d like:
| Method: | KidRocket | Glubble | Client
Based Filtering (Blue Coat k9) |
Proxy Server Filtering |
| What is it: | Dedicated kid-friendly fullscreen locked-down browser that won't exit (not a plug-in), that we link to in the startup folder of their XP account. So when they click their account it boots straight up to this browser. See kidrocket.org. Free. | A plugin for Firefox. Restricts where kids can go. You can define where it can and can't go. Free. More flexible than Kid Rocket, and allows your kids to go to alot more places. Be sure to remove other browsers. | Filter all content on each computer as it comes in from the internet or as it is requested. You can do this for free with Blue Coat k9 which is one of the best out there. It doesn't noticeably slow down the browsing experience and is easy to administer. WHETHER YOU DO ANY OF THE OTHERS AT LEAST DO THIS! You ought to put this on every computer in the house (unless you are doing proxy server filtering). | Filter all content by setting up a proxy server. Every webpage viewed on your network is automatically routed through this server, There's no way around it. Think of it as Big Brother. You can do it for free with a spare computer and Dansguardian and Squid. There are also retail products for doing this. |
| How easy is it: | Easy. Download and install on their own account (note, early windows versions won't allow you to create seperate accounts). Put a shortcut in the startup folder so it boots up when they log in. Delete all other browsers from their account. Then password protect your account. | Easy. Install Firefox, then install this plugin on their own account (note, early windows versions won't allow you to create seperate accounts). Delete all other browsers from their account. Then password protect your account. | Very easy. Just download and install. | For experienced users who know a bit about servers |
| How secure | Secure enough for under 10. | Not very secure, but better than nothing. | Pretty secure. Can be circumvented, but not very easily. Only Proxy Filtering is better. | Very secure. Can't go around this as long as they're using your network. |
| Downsides: | Very limited. Content is for kids under 10 only. | It doesn't really lock down the user environment (like kid rocket does). Seems like it might be easily circumvented. | Not many Downsides. You have to type a password to go to a non-approved site, but that's easy, and you choose right then whether to make the site temporary or permanently available. | Takes some server knowledge, but nothing that you can't learn given enough time. |